Telecommunication firms raise concerns DMS would give the regulator leeway to snoop on consumers’ private data.
However, a six-bench judge led by Chief Justice Martha Koome said they the petitioners did not provide compelling evidence that the device will breach privacy.
“In view of the above, we determine that this court does not have jurisdiction to hear and determine the instant petition of appeal,” said the apex court, as quoted by Business Daily.
The petitioners, including Safaricom PLC, the Law Society of Kenya (LSK) and Busia Senator Okiya Omutata, prayed to the court to stop the DMS rollout.
Read also
CMC Motors Renders 169 Kenyans Jobless as It Cuts Contract with 3 Car Brands
They argued that the Court of Appeal did not address the issue raised about privacy and snooping.
Supreme Court Judges ruled out LSK’s petition saying the partitioner did not litigate the matter in the Court of Appeal.
How CA’s DMS works
CA maintained it had no intentions of spying on users’ data, and the gadget has no capacity to access the phone records, location, and mobile money transaction details.